It’s the one question every college student anticipates with the beginning of each new encounter: What are you studying? And this is what should be expected because, after all, it follows a comfortable script. A question innocent in intention, the subsequent answer possesses a surprising amount of potential disclosure. In just a few words, the answer paints a full picture of the respondent’s interests, passions and future ambitions.
Answering this question has not only become routine to me, but it also has generated a sense of pride. “Communication and political science,” I respond. But, despite my own interest, I have come to expect familiar feedback.
“Oh, so you’re going to be one of them.”
“What makes you want to work with a bunch of corrupt politicians?”
“Communications and political science? So you’re going to help the government spin the truth?”
While I accept these responses with the realization that they were intended to be taken playfully, I cannot help but feel that at the root of it all lays real skepticism. Whether the jests originate from my relatives at family functions or strangers I meet on the street, this apprehension is a trend that seemingly does not discriminate. Distrust in our government is cross-generational and experienced within all races, socioeconomic backgrounds, education levels, and genders.
Unfortunately, the question of my chosen area of study often leaves me on the defensive. Suddenly I feel the need to justify my interest, as if my desire to work for the federal government is evidence of a deceitful nature within.
Complicating the issue further is the notion that, despite the common perception of a discredited government, the fundamental philosophy of our nation is grounded in ideals such as justice, liberty and opportunity. But it is as though dissatisfaction in our political leaders clouds our memory of a romanticized America. The America that was intended by our Founding Fathers and the Framers of the Constitution. Explaining my interest (I might even call it my love) for politics has become a delicate balance between emphasizing the rarity of our nation’s conception and defending the inherent conflicts of representative democracy.
So here is the expanded version of my defense, the version that I oftentimes am not allotted the time to fully explain.
The first time I became aware of the role of government in my life was September 11, 2001. Until that day, my understanding of politics was generally framed by observing my distant cousin run for state office. Even then, among a sea of yard signs, buttons, stickers, and fliers, I came to see the campaign lifestyle as somewhat fascinating. Seeing him in parades shaking hands and conversing with an array with strangers demonstrated the recognition and admiration that comes with serving a public office. You could say this was the planting of my interest.
But 9/11 was different. Government was no longer glamorous. It was necessary. Only eleven years old at the time, I had a difficult time coming to terms with the severity of the situation. After all, I lived in a small agricultural community in Ohio where our greatest threat was poor weather conditions. There were some clear indicators, however, that the events of 9/11 would change the world as I knew it. Some teachers strayed from lecture plans to allow students to watch history unveil itself. Other teachers fought back tears. The classroom environment was somber, almost to an uncomfortable degree.
The mood at home was not much different. My mother carried worry on her face and I could sense my father’s outrage. Something was terribly wrong and I knew my parents felt powerless to the threats of the modern world. After dinner, I went to my room to watch television. Since we did not have cable, my evening routine usually included ABC News. As I turned on my familiar program, the same images from earlier in the day replayed before me. Even Peter Jennings, an anchor I had become accustomed to, spoke of profound shock as the nation attempted to comprehend the destruction of our once invincible country.
What followed 9/11 is, perhaps, one of the strongest reasons for my interest in politics. Because the response of so many Americans not only exemplified the potential of the human spirit, but also the potential of our unique society. A city known for its impatience transformed into a representation of an unbreakable community. Despite widespread fear and sorrow, patriotism and love of country brought ideologies together for the common purpose of protecting our country and our values. Given a dose a tragic reality, we as a country grew more humble and more appreciative of our freedoms.
How, exactly, is the response of everyday citizens relevant to my argument in favor of politics? Because the spark of patriotism born on 9/11 ignited a renewed sense of pride in our country and it’s ability to overcome hardship. A country that is represented worldwide by the leaders whom the citizens select. Suddenly, Americans looked to these leaders for reassurance and resolve.
Sadly, many of the admirable behaviors of 9/11 have dissolved while negativity still persists. And the frustration is acceptable. Ten years later, we are still at war suffering loss at the hands of extremism.
But we as a nation have faced difficult times before. In fact, conflict and hardship have come to define the true resilience of the American spirit. The Revolutionary War, the Civil War, the Great Depression, World War I and World War II. All are core to the curriculum of American history. And who has come to personify these moments? Our nation’s leaders: George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, FDR.
Today, we face an array of challenges. Our economy is struggling to recover. Unemployment is affecting the wellbeing of many Americans. The flaws concerning education policy are becoming more prevalent. Some argue the moral standards of the country are degrading. All the while, party lines are becoming more defined as the rhetoric between politicians becomes more inflammatory. The behavior of our elected officials is creating two polarizing effects: hatred and apathy. Those with a strong party allegiance are inclined to demonize their opposing party, while those in the middle are becoming frustrated to the point of no longer wanting anything to do with government. And while I believe that some actions and statements have gone out of hand, I also think that many people are forgetting that we have experienced this climate before.
So it is unfair of candidates and politicians to use fear as a tool to motivate political action, as if we are facing the end of America. Rather than exaggerating the Apocalypse of the American way, our leaders should be focusing more on how they can transcend ideological differences to rebuild confidence our government.
And if people doubt that we have faced this level of severity before, I encourage them to place themselves within the context of the Civil War. We were literally on the verge of falling apart over what the two parties could not resolve sensibly: issues revolving around slavery, states’ rights and the election of President Lincoln. But now we see with unity that slavery is unjustifiable. In addition, President Lincoln consistently is ranked among the top American presidents in the history of our country.
Today, we face similarities of a different degree. Democrats and Republicans fail to compromise on nearly every crucial issue, from health care to the debt crisis, racking tensions nationwide. Similarly, President Barack Obama’s executive authority is generating fierce animosity among some irrational minds.
My point here is that, caught in the moment, it is easy for us as a nation to feel that we are dealing with unprecedented circumstances. But, at the end of the day, this is not our nation’s darkest hour. There is unlimited opportunity for us to improve as a nation and times such as these are a reminder of the possibilities to progress. I firmly believe that conditions in our nation will get better and we will continue to be a vibrant society.
So to return to the question I often face: why do I want to be involved with politics? Because I think we can be better. We can always be better. We are not a perfect nation nor should we ever believe that we have achieved such a state. The pursuit of perfection is endless. As Madison stated, if all men were angels, we would not need government. I share many frustrations and concerns as the majority of Americans, but I also believe that these feelings are a justifiable cost to maintaining democracy. I cannot always expect to be satisfied with the way our government is working, but I can expect that I will do my part to improve its flaws.
America has a rich and fascinating history. A history built on aspiration, sacrifice, innovation and patriotism. While my remarks may seem cliché, they are a sincere reflection of my intentions. With the tenth anniversary of September 11 less than a week away, I hope that more citizens reevaluate the moments that have shaped our current political landscape and where we as a nation should go from here.
“Too many people expect wonders from democracy, when the most wonderful thing of all is just having it.”
-Walter Winchell
